![]() ![]() The concept of civilians' involvement in war also developed in connection with general development and change of the ideological attitude to the state. ![]() This military view of civilian targets has effects on the equity of applied legal principles on which the prosecution of crimes against humanity are based. Hence, in practice, both sides in a conflict attack civilians and civilian infrastructure, with the understanding that they are legitimate and lawful targets in war. By this logic, if factories and workers producing material are part of the war effort, they become legitimate targets for attack, rather than protected non-combatants. ![]() This continuity of "military effort" from fighting combat troops to manufacturing facilities has profound effects for the concept of " total war". With the rapid increase of military technology, the term "military effort" has changed to include the "home front" as a reflection of both a civilian " sector" capacity to produce arms, as well as the structural or policy changes which deal with its vulnerability to direct attack. However, the expanded destructive capabilities of modern warfare posed an increased direct threat to civilian populations. Ĭivilians are traditionally uninvolved in combat, except when the hostilities happen to reach their residential areas. It is commonly used to describe the full participation of the British public in World War I who suffered Zeppelin raids and endured food rations as part of what came to be called the "Home Front". Home front is an English language term with analogues in other languages. "I am a good war hen, I eat little and produce a lot." French poster from World War I. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |